Peekay Intermark Ltd & Harish Pawani v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2005)

Judgment Date: 25 May 05

Summary By signing, without reading, terms and conditions relating to an investment that was fundamentally different to the investment product that had been orally explained to him, a company director had not shown that he was content to contract on those terms irrespective of any prior misrepresentation or that he...

The Newgate Stud Co & Newgate Stud Farm LLC v Anthony Penfold & Penfold Bloodstock Ltd (2005)

Judgment Date: 25 May 05

Summary The absence of informed consent was a necessary part of a claim alleging self-dealing by a company director. Accordingly, the absence of such consent was a material fact of the claim for the purposes of a waiver clause that did not apply to waive all claims a company might...

Harley Street Capital v Tchigirinsky & Ors (2005)

Judgment Date: 24 May 05

Summary The defendants had not disclosed a sufficient risk of loss during the relevant period to justify the fortification of a cross-undertaking from a claimant who had obtained a freezing injunction against them. Facts The first, third and fourth defendants applied for the fortification of a cross-undertaking in damages and...

Patel v Brent London Borough Council (2005)

Judgment Date: 23 May 05

Summary A claim for the return of a deposit paid to the local authority pursuant to an agreement under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s.106 amounted to seeking a modification or discharge of a planning obligation within the meaning of s.106, so that return of the deposit could only...

Keydon Estates Ltd v Eversheds LLP (2005)

Judgment Date: 20 May 05

Summary In assessing the appropriate measure of damage for loss arising from negligent legal advice, in respect of the purchase of a commercial property, the diminution in value rule could be departed from if the facts demonstrated that its application would work an injustice to a claimant, contrary to the...

MacKinnon v The Regent Trust Company Limited (2005)

Judgment Date: 19 May 05

UCB Corporate Service Ltd v Thomason (2005)

Judgment Date: 19 May 05

Summary When considering the proper construction of a proviso in a waiver agreement the court had to construe the waiver agreement as a whole and against its factual background. In the circumstances the comparison the court was required to make between the loss which would be caused to the representee...

Munib Masri v Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Ltd (2005)

Judgment Date: 17 May 05

Summary On the evidence, a claim in respect of the alleged non-performance of a written agreement had a real prospect of success and should proceed to trial. The court had jurisdiction over two of the defendants domiciled outside the English jurisdiction under Council Regulation 44/2001 Art.6(1) and therefore service of the...

Mitchell v Halliwell (2005)

Judgment Date: 13 May 05

Summary On the facts, the executors and trustees were liable to restore the sum of a commuted annuity, which had been gifted to the deceased's friend and solicitor, to the deceased's estate because the beneficiary children of the deceased had not received independent legal advice about the effect of the...