Summary A director and agent of companies was in breach of the self-dealing rule because he failed to obtain informed consent to sales when partnerships in which he was interested acquired race horses from those companies. Facts The claimant companies (C) claimed against the first defendant director (D1) for breach...

Summary On the proper construction of royalty-sharing provisions in agreements licensing the use of the claimant's genetic engineering technology by the defendant pharmaceutical companies, the defendants were not entitled to offset half of the royalties paid to third parties in respect of parts of the process for producing a drug...

Summary An agreement for the erection and use of advertising hoardings had been not intended to grant a tenancy of the land on which they were built to the company that had erected the hoardings. Facts The claimant company (C) sought a declaration that it held tenancies of 13 advertising sites...

Summary On the evidence, the chief executive of a racecourse management company had apparent or ostensible authority to sign an agreement with the claimant company granting it television picture rights, which was binding upon the racecourse owner. Facts The claimant company (C) sought to enforce a purported agreement with the...

Summary Liability orders made against the applicant had to be set aside as she had not been properly served notice. Facts The applicant (T) applied for judicial review of the decision of the defendant magistrates' court (C) to make a number of liability orders against her and its decision to...

Summary The minimum remedy that was required to do justice to a party was sufficient to satisfy equity. Facts The appellant (W) appealed an order that he pay compensation to the respondent (R). W had consented to R, who was his daughter, using land that he owned. W had withdrawn...

Summary In determining the question of unfitness to be concerned in the management of a company under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 s.6 it was not enough just to look at what happened in the company and say that all the directors were to blame and must therefore be found...

The assumption in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.9(1A)(d) that the price for enfranchising a freehold was to be diminished by the extent to which the value of the house had been increased by tenant's improvements did not require the value of the potential for improvement to be excluded...