Interlink v Revenko & Others

Judgment Date: 31 Jan 19

Successfully obtaining ex parte freezing and proprietary injunctions against former agents (and their associates) in claims for breach of fiduciary duty (secret profits and diversion of business opportunities), dishonest assistance, knowing receipt and conspiracy arising out of international titanium trading (Business List (ChD), January 2019.

(1) Koshigi Ltd (2) Svoboda Corp v (1) Donna Union Foundation (2) Ulmart Holdings Ltd (2019)

Judgment Date: 30 Jan 19

Summary It was appropriate to order the claimants to pay the costs of two applications under the Arbitration Act 1996 s.68 which they had discontinued. Further, those costs should be paid on the indemnity basis, the claimants' conduct having taken the case out of the norm. Facts The court ruled on...

Funding Secure Ltd v Matthew Green [2019]

Judgment Date: 29 Jan 19

Summary The claimant peer-to-peer lender succeeded in claims against the defendant borrower for deceit and breach of contract, and in debt. Facts The claimant peer-to-peer lender claimed against the defendant borrower in debt under a number of loan agreements and for damages for breach of contract and deceit.The defendant...

Sueda Yusuf (Claimant) v (1) Tanju Yusuf (2) Pekalp Properties Ltd (Defendants/Part 20 Claimants) & Ors (2019)

Judgment Date: 28 Jan 19

Summary In a dispute relating to a family-owned property company, the court granted an unfair prejudice petition and determined issues on the evidence, including the individual shareholdings of the respective family members and whether any were held on trust, and the status of purported share transfer and trust documentation. Facts...

Alexis Maitland-Hudson v Solicitors Regulation Authority (2019)

Judgment Date: 24 Jan 19

Summary There was no blanket rule that, when considering a litigant's ability to participate effectively in proceedings, judges had to ignore what they saw and heard in court and be guided only by medical evidence. Judges were entitled to form their own views and were not bound by expert evidence,...

Cunico Resources NV v Daskalakis (‘The 2017 Claim’) : Cunico Marketing Fze v Daskalakis (‘The 2018 Claim’) (2019)

Judgment Date: 18 Jan 19

Summary The High Court concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear claims by three companies against their chief executive officer and chief financial officer, because the claims were matters relating to individual contracts of employment under the Lugano Convention 2007 s.5 and the defendants were not domiciled in the...

Gary Joseph McDonald v Michelle Rose & 8 Ors (2019)

Judgment Date: 15 Jan 19

Summary The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the procedure to be followed by parties wishing to seek permission from a lower court to appeal to an appeal court. Facts The applicant applied for an extension of time to seek permission to appeal against a decision made in a succession...

Deansgate 123 LLP v (1) Ian Garth Workman (2) Ian Grant Workman : Carol Ann Forrester (As Executrix Of The Estate Of Susan Margaret Workman) v (1) Ian Garth Workman (2) Ian Grant Workman (2019)

Judgment Date: 11 Jan 19

Summary Applications under the Insolvency Act 1986 s.423 to set aside a transfer of property were not struck out as an abuse of process where they had been brought subsequent to the determination of the issue of the validity of the transfer. The question of validity was separate from the issue...

(1) Blue Power Group Sarl (2) Blue Wave Co SA (3) Blue Mgmt Ltd v (1) Eni Norge as (2) Eni Spa (3) Eniprogetti Spa (formerly Fecnomare Spa) (2018)

Judgment Date: 20 Dec 18

Summary Ahead of a breach of contract claim, it would be disproportionate to grant the defendants a Norwich Pharmacal order that the claimants disclose the source of documents in their possession that were potentially covered by the defendants' legal professional privilege. Given that it appeared that the parties had regularly...